Court Adjourns Hearing of Suspended Vice President Machar, Co-Accused to Friday

0
818
FVP Dr. Riek Machar Teny and seven other SPLM-IO members

By: Ginaba Lino

The Special Court in Juba has adjourned the high-profile trial of suspended First Vice President Dr. Riek Machar and seven co-accused until Friday, October 3rd, 2025.

Wednesday’s session saw the court hear statements from four of the accused, as presented by the investigative team. These statements originally recorded at the time of arrest were read aloud and pertained to Puot Kang Chuol, Minister of Petroleum, General Gabriel Duop Lam, Mam Pal Dhuor and Gatwich Lam Puoch

Presiding Judge James Alala Deng postponed the proceedings to allow the investigative committee additional time to present the remaining testimonies, including that of Dr. Machar. The court will reconvene Friday to continue the review of case materials.

The eight defendants are accused of involvement in the deadly Nasir attack, which took place between March 3 and 7, 2025, in Upper Nile State. The assault resulted in the deaths of over 250 people, including Major General David Majur Dak, numerous South Sudan People’s Defence Forces (SSPDF) soldiers, and two United Nations aviation personnel whose helicopter was reportedly shot down near the conflict zone.

The attack was carried out by the White Army historically composed of armed Nuer youth. Prosecutors allege that the accused played various roles in supporting the operation, although specific charges and individual responsibilities have not yet been publicly disclosed. A claims the accused defense lawyers denied.

All eight suspects were arrested in March 2025 and have remained in custody since except Dr. Riek Machar Teny who was placed under house confinement.

Legal proceedings were officially launched on September 11, 2025, by the Minister of Justice and Constitutional Affairs, Dr. Joseph Geng Akech, who affirmed the government’s commitment to due process and accountability.

The case has attracted significant attention both domestically and internationally and is widely seen as a critical test of South Sudan’s judicial independence, the rule of law, and the state’s capacity to pursue justice amid political tension.